Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 11119

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : January | Volume : 18 | Issue : 1 | Page : OC19 - OC22 Full Version

Prevalence, Risk Factors of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: January 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/65693.18902
P Spurthy, P Theertha, S Mamatha, Alamelu Haran, BS Praveen Kumar

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 2. Postgraduate Student, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 4. Professor and Head, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Vydehi Institue of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. S Mamatha,
Associate Professor, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Whitefield, Bengaluru-560066, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: dr.mamatha3@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: It is important to increase awareness and identify the predictors of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients presenting with worsening dyspnoea, as they are at a high-risk for Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) due to immobility, inflammation, and comorbidities.

Aim: To determine the prevalence of DVT in hospitalised patients with acute exacerbation of COPD, as well as to identify associated risk factors for DVT in this group.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2021 to June 2022 in the Department of Respiratory Medicine at Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. The sample population consisted of hospitalised patients with acute exacerbation of COPD who were aged over 40 years. All patients underwent routine blood investigations, Electrocardiograph (ECG), echocardiogram, arterial blood gas analysis, D-dimer test, chest radiograph, and lower-limb venous Doppler. Risk assessment was performed using the Modified Well’s criteria for DVT, and pretest probability was determined for all patients. The Chi-square test was used as a test of significance, with a p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant in all analyses.

Results: The mean age of the study population was found to be 60.80±10.21 years. Among the 74 patients included in the study, it was found that 3 (4.05%) patients had DVT. There was no statistically significant difference between the DVT and non DVT groups regarding age, sex, obesity, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) grade of breathlessness, smoking status, severity of airflow obstruction in spirometry, COPD class, type of respiratory failure, and presence of comorbidities. However, there was a statistically significant difference between the DVT and non DVT groups in terms of elevated D-dimer (>500 ng/mL), history of immobilisation for more than three days, and Modified Wells’ score (>2).

Conclusion: Patients with acute exacerbation of COPD, associated with a significant history of immobilisation and high D-dimer values, along with a high-risk pretest probability using clinical predictors such as the Modified Wells’ score for DVT, should be considered for evaluation of VTE and early initiation of prophylactic anticoagulation therapy to prevent Pulmonary Thromboembolism.

Keywords

D-dimer, Modified Wells’ score, Pulmonary thromboembolism, Spirometry

COPD is a pulmonary disease characterised by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible. Patients with COPD are at a high-risk for thromboembolism due to systemic inflammation, limited mobility, and co-existing comorbidities (1). Risk factors such as a higher Body Mass Index (BMI), lower exercise capacity, use of oxygen, and severe dyspnoea have been found to be associated with VTE (2). Keramidas G et al., reviewed the prevalence of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with chronic inflammatory lung diseases (3). The prevalence of DVT in various studies was 4.8%, 6.4%, 10.5%, and 10.6% (CI: 95%) (1),(4),(5),(6). Although various studies have reported the incidence and prevalence of VTE in cases of Acute Exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD), there is limited data in the Indian subpopulation on the occurrence of DVT in patients with chronic lung diseases, which can contribute to the development of pulmonary vascular abnormalities (7),(8),(9),(10),(11). The present study aims to determine the prevalence of DVT in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD, identify associated risk factors for VTE in such groups, and therefore reduce mortality due to pulmonary embolism through early detection.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Respiratory Medicine at Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India from March 2021 to June 2022. Approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (ECR/747/Inst/KA/2015/RR-18) was obtained.

Inclusion criteria: The study included all patients with COPD who were hospitalised due to acute exacerbation (diagnosed as per GOLD (12)) and were aged above 40 years.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with acute worsening breathlessness due to primary cardiac disorders, malignancy, stroke, coagulation disorders, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, those on regular anticoagulants, antiplatelet medication, antidepressants, and hormone replacement therapy, patients with a history of trauma or major surgeries in the past three months, and patients who were not willing to participate were not included in the study.

Study Procedure

A total of 74 participants with acute exacerbation of COPD, fulfilling the inclusion criteria, were enrolled in the study. Data was obtained through a detailed clinical history, including age, sex, mMRC grade of breathlessness (12), previous episodes of acute exacerbation, smoking history, treatment history, and history of immobilisation. Thorough physical examination, including height, weight, BMI, pulse rate, blood pressure, and systemic examination, including examination for signs of DVT, was performed. Bedside Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) (4-point compression test) was performed on all patients upon admission. Blood samples for arterial blood gas analysis, D-dimer, complete blood count, renal function test, and serum electrolytes were drawn immediately upon admission. ECG, echocardiogram, and chest radiographs were also obtained for all patients as part of routine COPD evaluation. Based on mMRC grade of breathlessness and history of exacerbations in the past, all the patients were classified using GOLD COPD assessment tool (12). Risk stratification for DVT was calculated for each patient at admission using Modified Wells’ criteria (13),(14). A Modified Wells’ score below two was considered low risk, while a score of 2 or more considered as high-risk for DVT. Bilateral lower limb venous Doppler was performed on all participants using KT-LM200HDPE Siemens Ultrasound-Doppler machine by the faculty of radiodiagnosis. The presence or absence of deep vein thrombus, including its extent, was reported. Arterial blood gases were analysed for Type 1 (hypoxemic) and Type 2 (hypercapnic) respiratory failure. A complete blood picture was obtained to look for signs of infection. D-dimer was tested at the time of admission, and a value above 500 ng/mL was considered the cutoff (13),(14),(15).

Statistical Analysis

The data was entered into a Microsoft Excel datasheet and analysed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 software (IBM SPSS Statistics, Somers NY, USA). Normally distributed data was represented as mean and standard deviation, while categorical data was presented as frequencies and proportions. The Chi-square test was used as a test of significance. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all analyses.

Results

Out of the 74 subjects with AECOPD, 60 (81.08%) were male, and 14 (18.92%) were female. The mean age of the study population was found to be 60.80±10.21 years. Among the AECOPD patients requiring hospitalisation, 28 (37.84%) were between 51 and 60 years of age. All patients were diagnosed cases of COPD on inhaler therapy with a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio of ≤70%.

Among them, 39 (52.71%) patients belonged to GOLD Grade-3 Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) % predicted between ≥30-49, followed by 24 (32.43%) patients belonging to GOLD Grade-2 (FEV1 % predicted between ≥50-79), and 11 (14.86%) patients belonged to GOLD Grade-1 (FEV1 % predicted ≥80%). A history of smoking was present in 52 (70%) patients, whereas 22 (30%) patients were non smokers. Among smokers, the mean number of cigarettes/beedis smoked per day was found to be 11.4±9.56. The average number of years of smoking was found to be 17.64±14.16, and the mean smoking index was 244.01±232.37.

Among non smokers, the aetiology of COPD was attributed to various causes, of which 13 (17.57%) patients had a history of biomass fuel exposure, which was also found to be the most common aetiology for COPD among non smokers. Among the nine patients with occupation-related COPD, 6 (8.10%) were farmers, one patient was a beedi roller, one patient was a carpenter, and the other patient worked as a railway employee. A total of 54 (72.97%) patients had AECOPD secondary to infection, whereas 20 (27.03%) patients were non compliant with inhalers. The DVT was diagnosed in 3 (4.05%) out of 74 patients. Out of the 71 patients without DVT, 42 (59.2%) patients had a D-dimer level <500 ng/mL, and 29 (40.8%) patients had a D-dimer level >500 ng/mL. All patients with DVT had a D-dimer level >500 ng/mL.

There was a statistically significant difference found between the two groups with respect to D-dimer.

Out of the 71 patients without DVT, 43 (60.6%) patients had a Modified Wells’ score of less than 2, and 28 (39.4%) patients had a score of 2 or more. It was observed that in all patients with DVT, the Modified Wells’ score was more than 2. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to the Modified Wells’ score.

Out of the 71 patients without DVT, 52 (73.2%) patients had no history of immobilisation, and 19 (26.8%) had a history of immobilisation (>3 days). All three patients with DVT had a history of immobilisation for more than three days. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to a history of immobilisation for more than three days (Table/Fig 1).

Discussion

In an observational trial conducted by Ilievska DK et al., in the Department of Pulmonology and Immunology at City General Hospital, Macedonia, 100 hospitalised patients with acute exacerbation of COPD were prospectively evaluated, and DVT was diagnosed in 5% (7). Pang H et al., performed a multi-centre, prospective, observational study involving 16 hospitals in China (8). Over the course of one year, out of 1144 patients with acute exacerbation of COPD, 64 were diagnosed with DVT. Børvik T et al., aimed to investigate the association between COPD and the risk of VTE and mortality in a population-based cohort, where a total of 49.5% had DVT (9). Park SH conducted a retrospective cohort study based on data collected from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) national database (1). The prevalence of DVT in men with COPD was about five times higher than that in men within the general population. In another study, by Chen CY and Liao KM, which aimed to estimate the influence of COPD on the development of VTE, the association between COPD and DVT was evaluated among the Asian population in a nationwide population-based cohort (10). It was found that the risk of DVT was 38% higher in the COPD cohort than in the non COPD cohort. In the present study, the prevalence of DVT in hospitalised cases of AECOPD was observed to be 3 (4.05%). These results are similar to the aforementioned studies.

The probable association between DVT and AECOPD might be due to chronic inflammation as well as immobilisation among AECOPD patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 studies by Fu X et al., revealed a combined incidence of 7% of DVT in 3170 AECOPD patients (16). In their study on 105 patients with COPD and acute exacerbation, Kamel MM et al., found that 28.6% of patients had PE and 26.7% had DVT (17). It was also concluded that DVT of the lower limbs was not essential in all cases of proven pulmonary embolism. Wells’ score and Geneva’s score were helpful tools for bedside assessment of the occurrence of VTE. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 studies, including 5854 patients, found the prevalence of DVT to be 9% (95% CI) (18). In a retrospective study of 116 patients with pulmonary embolism, 66 patients were diagnosed with COPD. The incidence of DVT in patients with combined PE and COPD was found to be 33% (19).

Ilievska DK et al., and Pang H et al., noted a positive correlation between COPD severity and DVT (7),(8). Immobility and obesity were significantly higher among these patients. After adjusting for co-variates, it was observed that a venous thrombosis history, prolonged immobility (≥3 days), and lower limb pain before hospitalisation were independently associated with the development of VTE, as per the above studies. In a population-based cohort conducted by Børvik T et al., patients with COPD stage III/IV (C/D) had a 1.6-times higher risk of VTE than those without COPD (9). Among the numerous factors predisposing to DVT, prolonged immobilisation, especially during hospitalisation, was found to be a major risk factor. Immobility increases the possibility of a pro-thrombotic state when the duration is more than 24 hours. It will be a risk factor if the duration exceeds three days (11). Therefore, patients with frequent episodes of exacerbation leading to immobilisation and COPD patients on long-term oxygen therapy are at high-risk for DVT. A significant association has been reported between smoking and COPD exacerbation in various studies (20),(21). Therefore, patients who have smoked for a long duration are at a higher risk for exacerbation and repeated hospitalisation leading to prolonged immobilisation.

Dentali F et al., Ilievska DK et al., Pang H, et al., and Dong W et al., have all found a positive correlation between elevated D-dimer levels and the prevalence of VTE in their respective studies (4),(7),(8),(11). A negative D-dimer is a valuable laboratory index for excluding VTE (11). It has been reported that high D-dimer levels were found in 95% of COPD patients experiencing acute exacerbation with VTE (11). Since, 72.97% of the patients in the present study had an infective exacerbation, the relevance of elevated D-dimer as an independent marker of thromboembolism in this clinical setting cannot be definitively concluded. However, the present study did find a significant association between high D-dimer values (>500 ng/mL) and VTE.

Clinical predictors for VTE, such as Modified Wells’ criteria, are frequently used to assess the likelihood of DVT in patients with prolonged immobilisation, such as post-operative or trauma cases, due to their high sensitivity and specificity. In the present study, the Modified Wells’ score for DVT was found to be highly statistically significant and may therefore be a useful tool in determining the pretest probability. Both physicians and patients are highly concerned about the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of COPD, especially due to its increasing global incidence (22). In patients with COPD exacerbation, VTE is considered an independent risk factor for poor prognosis. The mortality rate among AECOPD cases is also higher when combined with VTE (22). Due to their similar clinical presentation, PE is more likely to be misdiagnosed or ignored in COPD cases (22). Therefore, prompt diagnosis and early initiation of anticoagulation therapy become integral parts of the prevention of pulmonary embolism and improvement of outcomes in AECOPD cases with a high-risk for VTE (22).

Limitation(s)

Firstly, the sample size was relatively small. Secondly, not all AECOPD patients had their lung function tested during hospitalisation, few cases were diagnosed based on Pulmonary Function Test (PFT) reports available with the patients, ranging from three years to two months prior to presentation. This could have potentially affected the results when comparing the severity of airflow obstruction with the incidence of VTE. Finally, follow-up was not conducted to evaluate mortality.

Conclusion

As pulmonary physicians, our goal is to reduce the incidence of VTE in COPD cases and to enhance the prognosis and survival rate of COPD patients with VTE. Based on the results of the present study, we can conclude that all hospitalised patients with acute exacerbation of COPD, who have risk factors such as a history of immobilisation for more than three days, high D-dimer values (>500 ng/mL), and those with a high pretest probability of VTE, should be actively evaluated for thromboembolism and treated accordingly. Initiating prophylactic anticoagulant therapy early among high-risk groups of AECOPD may help in reducing the incidence of VTE. Furthermore, early initiation of chest physiotherapy, limb exercises, and pulmonary rehabilitation to improve the quality of life in AECOPD patients can contribute to reducing the incidence, morbidity, and mortality associated with VTE.

References

1.
Park SH. Pulmonary embolism is more prevalent than deep vein thrombosis in cases of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and interstitial lung diseases. Springer Plus. 2016;5(1):1777. Doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3475-8. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Kim V, Goel N, Gangar J, Zhao H, Ciccolella DE, Silverman EK, et al. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2014;1(2):239-49. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Keramidas G, Gourgoulianis KI, Kotsiou OS. Venous thromboembolic disease in chronic inflammatory lung diseases: Knowns and unknowns. J Clin Med. 2021;10(10):2061. Doi: 10.3390/jcm10102061. PMID: 34064992; PMCID: PMC8151562. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Dentali F, Pomero F, Micco PD, Regina ML, Landini F, Mumoli N, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for pulmonary embolism in patients with suspected acute exacerbation of COPD: A multi-center study. Eur J Intern Med. 2020;80:54-59. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2020.05.006. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Aleva FE, Voets LW, Simons SO, de Mast Q, van der Ven AJAM, Heijdra YF. Prevalence and localization of pulmonary embolism in unexplained acute exacerbations of COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2017;151:544-54. Doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.07.034. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Gunen H, Gulbas G, In E, Yetkin O, Hacievliyagil SS. Venous thromboemboli and exacerbations of COPD. Eur Respir J. 2010;35:1243. Doi: 10.1183/09031936.00120909. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Ilievska DK, Trajkovska I, Dimitrovska M. Prevalence and risk factors for Pulmonary Embolism (PE) and Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) during Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD). Medical Research Journal. 2020;5(2):2451-4101. Doi: 10.5603/MRJ.a2020.0024. [crossref]
8.
Pang H, Wang L, Liu J, Wang S, Yang Y, Yang T, et al. The prevalence and risk factors of venous thromboembolism in hospitalised patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Clinical Respiratory Journal. 2018;12(11):2573-80. Doi: 10.1111/crj.12959.[crossref][PubMed]
9.
Børvik T, Brækkan SK, Enga K, Schirmer H, Brodin EE, Melbye H, et al. COPD and risk of venous thromboembolism and mortality in a general population. Eur Respir J. 2016;47(2):473-81. Doi: 10.1183/13993003.00402-2015. Epub 2015 Nov 19. PMID: 26585434. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Chen CY, Liao KM. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis in Asian patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(44):e1741. Doi: 10.1097/MD.1741. PMID: 26554770; PMCID: PMC4915871. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Dong W, Zhu Y, Du Y, Ma S. Association between features of COPD and risk of venous thromboembolism. The Clinical Respiratory Journal. 2019;13(8):499- 504. Doi: 10.1111/crj.13051. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Global Strategy for Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Diseases (GOLD). 2020 report. Available from: https://goldcopd.org/gold-reports.
13.
Van der Hulle T, Cheung WY, Kooij SH, Beenen LFM, van Bemmel T, van Es J, et al; Years Study Group. Simplified diagnostic management of suspected pulmonary embolism (the YEARS study): A prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet. 2017;390:289-97. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, Danchin N, Fitzmaurice D, Galiè N, et al. Task force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(43):3033-69, 3069a-3069k. Doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu283. Epub 2014 Aug 29. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2015 Oct 14;36(39):2666. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2015;36(39):2642. PMID: 25173341.
15.
Lippi G, Bonfanti L, Saccenti C, Cervellin G. Causes of elevated D-dimer in patients admitted to a large urban emergency department. Eur J Intern Med. 2014;25(1):45- 48. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Aug 13. PMID: 23948628. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Fu X, Zhong Y, Xu W, Ju J, Yu M, Ge M, et al. The prevalence and clinical features of pulmonary embolism in patients with AE-COPD: A meta-analysis and systematic review. PLoS One. 2021;16(9):e0256480. Doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0256480. PMID: 34473738; PMCID: PMC8412363. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Kamel MM, Moussa H, Ismail A. Prevalence of venous thrombo-embolism in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis. 2013;62(4):557-66. [crossref]
18.
Han W, Wang M, Xie Y, Ruan H, Zhao H, Li J. Prevalence of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thromboembolism in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:732855. Doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.732855. PMID: 35355978; PMCID: PMC8959435. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Castellana G, Intiglietta P, Dragonieri S, CarratÙ P, Buonamico P, Peragine M, et al. Incidence of deep venous thrombosis in patients with both Pulmonary Embolism and COPD. Acta Biomed. 2021;92(3):e2021210. Doi: 10.23750/abm. v92i3.11258. PMID: 34212912; PMCID: PMC8343729.
20.
Josephs L, Culliford D, Johnson M, Thomas M. Improved outcomes in ex-smokers with COPD: A UK primary care observational cohort study. Eur Respir J [Internet]. 2017;49(5):1602114. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Badaran E, Ortega E, Bujalance C, Puerto LD, Torres M, Riesco JA. Smoking and COPD exacerbations. European Respiratory Journal. 2012;40: P1055.
22.
Yang R, Liu G, Deng C. Pulmonary embolism with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2021;7(3):149-56. Doi: 10.1016/j. cdtm.2021.04.001. PMID: 34505015; PMCID: PMC8413125.[crossref][PubMed]

Tables and Figures
[Table / Fig - 1]
DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/65693.18902

Date of Submission: May 29, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Aug 05, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 20, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 30, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 17, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 16, 2023 (4%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com